RE: [PATCH v2 10/10] x86emul: AVX512-FP16 testing

2023-06-05 Thread Henry Wang
Hi Jan, > -Original Message- > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] x86emul: AVX512-FP16 testing > > Henry, > > On 03.04.2023 17:00, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Naming of some of the builtins isn't fully consistent with that of pre- > > existing ones, so there

Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] x86emul: AVX512-FP16 testing

2023-06-05 Thread Jan Beulich
Henry, On 03.04.2023 17:00, Jan Beulich wrote: > Naming of some of the builtins isn't fully consistent with that of pre- > existing ones, so there's a need for a new BR2() wrapper macro. > > With the tests providing some proof of proper functioning of the > emulator code also enable use of the fe

[PATCH v2 10/10] x86emul: AVX512-FP16 testing

2023-04-03 Thread Jan Beulich
Naming of some of the builtins isn't fully consistent with that of pre- existing ones, so there's a need for a new BR2() wrapper macro. With the tests providing some proof of proper functioning of the emulator code also enable use of the feature by guests, as there's no other infrastructure involv