> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 10:50 PM
>
> The VT-d hook can indicate an error, which shouldn't be ignored. Convert
> the hook's return value to a proper error code, and let that bubble up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> ---
> I'm not convinced of the XSM related
On 27/01/2022 14:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
The VT-d hook can indicate an error, which shouldn't be ignored. Convert
the hook's return value to a proper error code, and let that bubble up.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant
The VT-d hook can indicate an error, which shouldn't be ignored. Convert
the hook's return value to a proper error code, and let that bubble up.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
I'm not convinced of the XSM related behavior here: It's neither clear
why the check gets performed on the possible
