On 02/05/2024 2:04 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.04.2024 20:28, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> If max leaf is greater than 0xd but xsave not available to the guest, then
>> the
>> current XSAVE size should not be filled in. This is a latent bug for now as
>> the guest max leaf is 0xd, but will become p
On 29.04.2024 20:28, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> If max leaf is greater than 0xd but xsave not available to the guest, then the
> current XSAVE size should not be filled in. This is a latent bug for now as
> the guest max leaf is 0xd, but will become problematic in the future.
Why would this not be an
If max leaf is greater than 0xd but xsave not available to the guest, then the
current XSAVE size should not be filled in. This is a latent bug for now as
the guest max leaf is 0xd, but will become problematic in the future.
The comment concerning XSS state is wrong. VT-x doesn't manage host/gue
