On 18.07.2022 14:54, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 02:06:07PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.07.2022 17:32, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> That's possible, because the capability was designed specifically to
>>> allow separate driver handle it, in parallel t
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 02:06:07PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.07.2022 17:32, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > That's possible, because the capability was designed specifically to
> > allow separate driver handle it, in parallel to unmodified xhci driver
> > (separate set of registers, p
On 06.07.2022 17:32, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> That's possible, because the capability was designed specifically to
> allow separate driver handle it, in parallel to unmodified xhci driver
> (separate set of registers, pretending the port is "disconnected" for
> the main xhci driver etc).
That's possible, because the capability was designed specifically to
allow separate driver handle it, in parallel to unmodified xhci driver
(separate set of registers, pretending the port is "disconnected" for
the main xhci driver etc). It works with Linux dom0, although requires
an awful hack - re
