Hi Stefano,
> On Sep 28, 2023, at 08:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 27 Sep 2023, at 09:53, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/psci.c b/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
>> index 695d2fa1f1..2a8527cacc 100644
>> --- a/xen/
> On 28 Sep 2023, at 02:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 27 Sep 2023, at 09:53, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/psci.c b/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
>> index 695d2fa1f1..2a8527cacc 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/ps
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> > On 27 Sep 2023, at 09:53, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> >
> >>> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/psci.c b/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
> >>> > index 695d2fa1f1..2a8527cacc 100644
> >>> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
> >>> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
> >>> > @@ -59,6 +59,
> On 27 Sep 2023, at 09:35, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>
> Hi Jan,
>
>> On 27 Sep 2023, at 10:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 27.09.2023 10:14, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 27 Sep 2023, at 09:53, Nicola Vetrini
wrote:
My opinion is that it's far easier for this to be an eclair co
Hi Jan,
> On 27 Sep 2023, at 10:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 27.09.2023 10:14, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 27 Sep 2023, at 09:53, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> My opinion is that it's far easier for this to be an eclair configuration
>>> (which has the
>>> advantage not to depend on the exact
On 27.09.2023 10:14, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 27 Sep 2023, at 09:53, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>> My opinion is that it's far easier for this to be an eclair configuration
>> (which has the
>> advantage not to depend on the exact definition of unreachable) and then
>> perhaps a comment
>> above
Hi,
> On 27 Sep 2023, at 09:53, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>
>>> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/psci.c b/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
>>> > index 695d2fa1f1..2a8527cacc 100644
>>> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
>>> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
>>> > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ void call_psci_cpu_off(void)
>>> > }
>>> >
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/psci.c b/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
> index 695d2fa1f1..2a8527cacc 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/psci.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ void call_psci_cpu_off(void)
> }
> }
> +/* SAF-2-safe */
I think any use of SAF-2-safe should be accompanied with an
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 09/09/2023 00:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > From: Stefano Stabellini
> >
> > During the discussions that led to the acceptance of Rule 2.1, we
> > decided on a few exceptions that were not properly recorded in
> > rules.rst. Add t
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.09.2023 01:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > From: Stefano Stabellini
> >
> > During the discussions that led to the acceptance of Rule 2.1, we
> > decided on a few exceptions that were not properly recorded in
> > rules.rst. Add them now.
> >
> >
Hi Stefano,
On 09/09/2023 00:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
From: Stefano Stabellini
During the discussions that led to the acceptance of Rule 2.1, we
decided on a few exceptions that were not properly recorded in
rules.rst. Add them now.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
Acked-by: Jan Beulic
On 09.09.2023 01:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> From: Stefano Stabellini
>
> During the discussions that led to the acceptance of Rule 2.1, we
> decided on a few exceptions that were not properly recorded in
> rules.rst. Add them now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
> Acked-by: Jan Beuli
From: Stefano Stabellini
During the discussions that led to the acceptance of Rule 2.1, we
decided on a few exceptions that were not properly recorded in
rules.rst. Add them now.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
---
Nicola, does this work with ECLAIR?
I am referring to
13 matches
Mail list logo
