Hi Jan,
On 29/04/2021 14:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.04.2021 15:15, Julien Grall wrote:
On 15/04/2021 10:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
This array can be large when many grant frames are permitted; avoid
allocating it when it's not going to be used anyway, by doing this only
in gnttab_populate_status
On 29.04.2021 15:15, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 15/04/2021 10:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> This array can be large when many grant frames are permitted; avoid
>> allocating it when it's not going to be used anyway, by doing this only
>> in gnttab_populate_status_frames().
>
> Given the controversy of t
Hi Jan,
On 15/04/2021 10:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
This array can be large when many grant frames are permitted; avoid
allocating it when it's not going to be used anyway, by doing this only
in gnttab_populate_status_frames().
Given the controversy of the change, I would suggest to summarize why
Hi Jan,
On 29/04/2021 10:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2021 11:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
This array can be large when many grant frames are permitted; avoid
allocating it when it's not going to be used anyway, by doing this only
in gnttab_populate_status_frames().
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
On 15.04.2021 11:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This array can be large when many grant frames are permitted; avoid
> allocating it when it's not going to be used anyway, by doing this only
> in gnttab_populate_status_frames().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
I know there has been controversy here. Jul
This array can be large when many grant frames are permitted; avoid
allocating it when it's not going to be used anyway, by doing this only
in gnttab_populate_status_frames().
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
v3: Drop smp_wmb(). Re-base.
v2: Defer allocation to when a domain actually switches to th
