On Mon, 28 Mar 2022, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> On 3/25/22 17:05, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> So to me, the idea of switching to a "fake" domain or bypassing the check
> >> is
> >> more appealing. I have a preference for the "fake" domain here.
> >
>
On 3/25/22 17:05, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, Julien Grall wrote:
>> So to me, the idea of switching to a "fake" domain or bypassing the check is
>> more appealing. I have a preference for the "fake" domain here.
>
> As a maintainer, I am not opposed to the
On 3/25/22 17:05, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, Julien Grall wrote:
>> So to me, the idea of switching to a "fake" domain or bypassing the check is
>> more appealing. I have a preference for the "fake" domain here.
>
> As a maintainer, I am not opposed to the
Hi Stefano,
On 25/03/2022 21:05, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, Julien Grall wrote: > As a contributor, sadly I won't be
able to spend a lot of time on this
in the following months. If a significant rework is required, I don't
think I'll be able to do it, at least not for this
On 3/25/22 12:52, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:46 AM Daniel P. Smith
> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/24/22 20:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.03.2022 01:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> The existing XSM check in
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, Julien Grall wrote:
> So to me, the idea of switching to a "fake" domain or bypassing the check is
> more appealing. I have a preference for the "fake" domain here.
As a maintainer, I am not opposed to the "fake"/"contructor" domain
concept. It all depends on how many
Hi Stefano,
On 25/03/2022 00:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.03.2022 01:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
On 1/28/22 16:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
From: Luca Miccio
The xenstore event channel will be
Hi Daniel,
On 25/03/2022 15:45, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
The existing XSM check in evtchn_alloc_unbound cannot work and should
not work: it is based on the current domain having enough privileges to
create the event channel. In this case, we have no current domain at
all. The current domain is
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:46 AM Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>
> On 3/24/22 20:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 23.03.2022 01:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> The existing XSM check in evtchn_alloc_unbound cannot work and should
> >>> not work: it is
On 3/24/22 20:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.03.2022 01:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
On 1/28/22 16:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> From: Luca Miccio
>
> The xenstore event channel
On 25.03.2022 01:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Maybe, instead of exporting get_free_port, we could create a new
> function in xen/common/event_channel.c and mark it as __init? This way:
> - we don't need to expose get_free_port
> - the new function would only be __init anyway, so no risk of
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.03.2022 01:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> >> On 1/28/22 16:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> From: Luca Miccio
> >>>
> >>> The xenstore event channel will be allocated for dom0less domains. It is
>
On 3/22/22 20:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> On 1/28/22 16:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> From: Luca Miccio
>>>
>>> The xenstore event channel will be allocated for dom0less domains. It is
>>> necessary to have access to the evtchn_alloc_unbound
On 23.03.2022 01:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> On 1/28/22 16:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> From: Luca Miccio
>>>
>>> The xenstore event channel will be allocated for dom0less domains. It is
>>> necessary to have access to the
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> On 1/28/22 16:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > From: Luca Miccio
> >
> > The xenstore event channel will be allocated for dom0less domains. It is
> > necessary to have access to the evtchn_alloc_unbound function to do
> > that, so make
On 1/28/22 16:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> From: Luca Miccio
>
> The xenstore event channel will be allocated for dom0less domains. It is
> necessary to have access to the evtchn_alloc_unbound function to do
> that, so make evtchn_alloc_unbound public.
>
> Add a skip_xsm parameter to allow
On 28.01.2022 22:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> From: Luca Miccio
>
> The xenstore event channel will be allocated for dom0less domains. It is
> necessary to have access to the evtchn_alloc_unbound function to do
> that, so make evtchn_alloc_unbound public.
>
> Add a skip_xsm parameter to
From: Luca Miccio
The xenstore event channel will be allocated for dom0less domains. It is
necessary to have access to the evtchn_alloc_unbound function to do
that, so make evtchn_alloc_unbound public.
Add a skip_xsm parameter to allow disabling the XSM check in
evtchn_alloc_unbound
18 matches
Mail list logo
