On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 9:44 AM Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23/12/2020 13:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 23.12.2020 14:33, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> On 23/12/2020 13:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> From the input by both of you I still can't
> >>> conclude whether this patch should remain as is in
Hi Jan,
On 23/12/2020 14:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.12.2020 15:44, Julien Grall wrote:
On 23/12/2020 13:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.12.2020 14:33, Julien Grall wrote:
On 23/12/2020 13:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
From the input by both of you I still can't
conclude whether this patch should
On 23.12.2020 15:44, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/12/2020 13:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.12.2020 14:33, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 23/12/2020 13:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
From the input by both of you I still can't
conclude whether this patch should remain as is in v4, or revert
On 23/12/2020 13:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.12.2020 14:33, Julien Grall wrote:
On 23/12/2020 13:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
From the input by both of you I still can't
conclude whether this patch should remain as is in v4, or revert
back to its v2 version. Please can we get this settled so I
On 23.12.2020 14:33, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/12/2020 13:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> From the input by both of you I still can't
>> conclude whether this patch should remain as is in v4, or revert
>> back to its v2 version. Please can we get this settled so I can get
>> v4 out?
>
> I haven't had
On 23/12/2020 13:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.12.2020 18:35, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:30 PM Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 07/12/2020 15:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2020 20:15, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
On
On 07.12.2020 18:35, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:30 PM Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> On 07/12/2020 15:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 04.12.2020 20:15, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 15:21, Tamas
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:30 PM Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 07/12/2020 15:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 04.12.2020 20:15, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
> >>> On 04/12/2020 15:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at
Hi Jan,
On 07/12/2020 15:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2020 20:15, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
On 04/12/2020 15:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On
On 07/12/2020 08:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2020 16:09, Julien Grall wrote:
On 04/12/2020 12:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2020 12:51, Julien Grall wrote:
On 04/12/2020 11:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2020 12:28, Julien Grall wrote:
On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On
On 04.12.2020 20:15, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 04/12/2020 15:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
On 04.12.2020 16:09, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 12:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 04.12.2020 12:51, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2020 11:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2020 12:28, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:22 PM Julien Grall wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 19:15, Tamas K Lengyel
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 04/12/2020 15:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:29 AM Julien Grall
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 19:15, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 04/12/2020 15:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Jan,
> > >>
> > >> On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich
On 04/12/2020 15:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
While there don't look to be any problems with this right now,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:29 AM Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> While there don't look to be any problems with this right now, the lock
> >>> order
Hi,
On 04/12/2020 12:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2020 12:51, Julien Grall wrote:
On 04/12/2020 11:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2020 12:28, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich
On 04.12.2020 12:51, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 04/12/2020 11:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 04.12.2020 12:28, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> While
On 04/12/2020 11:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2020 12:28, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
While there don't look to be any problems with this right now, the lock
order
On 04.12.2020 12:28, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
While there don't look to be any problems with this right now, the lock
order implications from holding
Hi Jan,
On 03/12/2020 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
While there don't look to be any problems with this right now, the lock
order implications from holding the lock can be very difficult to follow
(and may be easy to
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:09 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> While there don't look to be any problems with this right now, the lock
> >> order implications from holding the lock can be very difficult to follow
>
On 02.12.2020 22:10, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> While there don't look to be any problems with this right now, the lock
>> order implications from holding the lock can be very difficult to follow
>> (and may be easy to violate unknowingly). The present
Hi Jan,
On 23/11/2020 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
While there don't look to be any problems with this right now, the lock
order implications from holding the lock can be very difficult to follow
(and may be easy to violate unknowingly). The present callbacks don't
(and no such callback should)
On 23.11.2020 15:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
While there don't look to be any problems with this right now, the lock
order implications from holding the lock can be very difficult to follow
(and may be easy to violate unknowingly). The present callbacks don't
(and no such callback should) have any
While there don't look to be any problems with this right now, the lock
order implications from holding the lock can be very difficult to follow
(and may be easy to violate unknowingly). The present callbacks don't
(and no such callback should) have any need for the lock to be held.
However,
26 matches
Mail list logo