[PATCH v4 for-4.19? 2/2] cmdline: "extra_guest_irqs" is inapplicable to PVH

2024-07-02 Thread Jan Beulich
PVH in particular has no (externally visible) notion of pIRQ-s. Mention that in the description of the respective command line option and have arch_hwdom_irqs() also reflect this (thus suppressing the log message there as well, as being pretty meaningless in this case anyway). Suggested-by: Roger

Re: [PATCH v4 for-4.19? 2/2] cmdline: "extra_guest_irqs" is inapplicable to PVH

2024-07-03 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 11:52:38AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > PVH in particular has no (externally visible) notion of pIRQ-s. Mention > that in the description of the respective command line option and have > arch_hwdom_irqs() also reflect this (thus suppressing the log message > there as well, as

Re: [PATCH v4 for-4.19? 2/2] cmdline: "extra_guest_irqs" is inapplicable to PVH

2024-07-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.07.2024 09:51, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 11:52:38AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> PVH in particular has no (externally visible) notion of pIRQ-s. Mention >> that in the description of the respective command line option and have >> arch_hwdom_irqs() also reflect this (thu

Re: [PATCH v4 for-4.19? 2/2] cmdline: "extra_guest_irqs" is inapplicable to PVH

2024-07-03 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 10:00:51AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 03.07.2024 09:51, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 11:52:38AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> PVH in particular has no (externally visible) notion of pIRQ-s. Mention > >> that in the description of the respective com