On 02.10.2023 17:11, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Since it was indicated that introducing specific new vCPU ops may be
> beneficial independent of the introduction of a fully physical-
> address-based ABI flavor, here we go. There continue to be a few open
> questions throughout the series, resolving o
On 05.10.2023 20:58, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> I see this series has been committed. But it's broken in a really
> fundamental way.
>
>
> This is a new extension with persistent side effects to an existing part
> of the guest ABI.
>
> Yet there doesn't appear to be any enumeration that the interfa
On 06/10/2023 9:00 am, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:58:50PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Henry: Blocker for 4.18. The absolutely bare minimum necessary to
>> avoid reversion is some kind of positive enumeration that the two new
>> hypercalls are available.
>>
>> Otherwise
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:00:35AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:58:50PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > I see this series has been committed. But it's broken in a really
> > fundamental way.
> >
> >
> > This is a new extension with persistent side effects to an exis
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:58:50PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> I see this series has been committed. But it's broken in a really
> fundamental way.
>
>
> This is a new extension with persistent side effects to an existing part
> of the guest ABI.
The only change in the ABI is the different re
On 05/10/2023 23:40, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 05/10/2023 19:58, Andrew Cooper wrote:
I see this series has been committed. But it's broken in a really
fundamental way.
Thanks for pointing out. But I'd like to understand how I come to only
hear about those concerns on the series
Hi Andrew,
On 05/10/2023 19:58, Andrew Cooper wrote:
I see this series has been committed. But it's broken in a really
fundamental way.
Thanks for pointing out. But I'd like to understand how I come to only
hear about those concerns on the series after committing. Did I miss any
thread? Eve
I see this series has been committed. But it's broken in a really
fundamental way.
This is a new extension with persistent side effects to an existing part
of the guest ABI.
Yet there doesn't appear to be any enumeration that the interface is
available to begin with. Requiring the guest to pro
Hi,
On 05/10/2023 02:27, Henry Wang wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Oct 2, 2023, at 23:11, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Since it was indicated that introducing specific new vCPU ops may be
beneficial independent of the introduction of a fully physical-
address-based ABI flavor, here we go. There continue to b
Hi Roger,
> On Oct 2, 2023, at 23:11, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>
> Since it was indicated that introducing specific new vCPU ops may be
> beneficial independent of the introduction of a fully physical-
> address-based ABI flavor, here we go. There continue to be a few open
> questions throughout t
Since it was indicated that introducing specific new vCPU ops may be
beneficial independent of the introduction of a fully physical-
address-based ABI flavor, here we go. There continue to be a few open
questions throughout the series, resolving of which was one of the main
goals of the earlier pos
11 matches
Mail list logo
