On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 13:59 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.03.2023 13:52, Oleksii wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 11:36 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 03.03.2023 11:38, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h
> > > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h
> > > >
On 07.03.2023 13:52, Oleksii wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 11:36 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 03.03.2023 11:38, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h
>>> @@ -1,79 +1,12 @@
>>> #ifndef __X86_BUG_H__
>>> #define __X86_BUG_H__
>
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 11:36 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 03.03.2023 11:38, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > The following changes were made:
> > * Make GENERIC_BUG_FRAME mandatory for X86
> > * Update asm/bug.h using generic implementation in
> > * Change prototype of debugger_trap_fatal() in asm/deb
On 03.03.2023 11:38, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> The following changes were made:
> * Make GENERIC_BUG_FRAME mandatory for X86
> * Update asm/bug.h using generic implementation in
> * Change prototype of debugger_trap_fatal() in asm/debugger.h
> to align it with generic prototype in .
Is this par
The following changes were made:
* Make GENERIC_BUG_FRAME mandatory for X86
* Update asm/bug.h using generic implementation in
* Change prototype of debugger_trap_fatal() in asm/debugger.h
to align it with generic prototype in .
* Update do_invalid_op using generic do_bug_frame()
Signed-off-by: