On 05.07.2022 14:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> For a long time we've been rather inefficient with IOMMU page table
> management when not sharing page tables, i.e. in particular for PV (and
> further specifically also for PV Dom0) and AMD (where nowadays we never
> share page tables). While up to about 3
On 05.07.2022 14:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> For a long time we've been rather inefficient with IOMMU page table
> management when not sharing page tables, i.e. in particular for PV (and
> further specifically also for PV Dom0) and AMD (where nowadays we never
> share page tables). While up to about 3
For a long time we've been rather inefficient with IOMMU page table
management when not sharing page tables, i.e. in particular for PV (and
further specifically also for PV Dom0) and AMD (where nowadays we never
share page tables). While up to about 3.5 years ago AMD code had logic
to un-shatter pa
