On 26/01/2021 08:58, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 21/01/2021 21:27, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/sysctl.h b/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
>> index a073647117..d4453d2eab 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
>> @@
Hi Andrew,
On 21/01/2021 21:27, Andrew Cooper wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/public/sysctl.h b/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
index a073647117..d4453d2eab 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct xen_sysctl_tbuf_op {
#define
Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH v7 01/10] xen+tools: Introduce
XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vmtrace"):
> We're about to introduce support for Intel Processor Trace, but similar
> functionality exists in other platforms.
>
> Aspects of vmtrace can reasonably c
We're about to introduce support for Intel Processor Trace, but similar
functionality exists in other platforms.
Aspects of vmtrace can reasonably can be common, so start with
XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vmtrace and plumb the signal from Xen all the way down into
`xl info`.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
