On 2023-11-21 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.10.2023 15:22, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
@@ -1034,10 +1034,10 @@ int guest_wrmsr_x2apic(struct vcpu *v,
uint32_t msr, uint64_t val)
case APIC_EOI:
case APIC_ESR:
if ( va
On 25.10.2023 15:22, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> @@ -1034,10 +1034,10 @@ int guest_wrmsr_x2apic(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr,
> uint64_t val)
> case APIC_EOI:
> case APIC_ESR:
> if ( val )
> -{
> -defaul
On 2023-10-25 15:22, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
The clauses of a switch should be enclosed directly by a switch
statement to make the code more easily understandable and less
prone to errors.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini
---
This patch is mainly indended to probe how the community, especially
the
On 25/10/2023 15:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.10.2023 15:22, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
The clauses of a switch should be enclosed directly by a switch
statement to make the code more easily understandable and less
prone to errors.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini
---
This patch is mainly indended to
On 25.10.2023 15:22, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> The clauses of a switch should be enclosed directly by a switch
> statement to make the code more easily understandable and less
> prone to errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini
> ---
> This patch is mainly indended to probe how the community, espe
The clauses of a switch should be enclosed directly by a switch
statement to make the code more easily understandable and less
prone to errors.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini
---
This patch is mainly indended to probe how the community, especially the
maintainers, would receive such modifications
