Re: [RFC PATCH] xen: Introduce arch specific field to XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo

2021-08-30 Thread Oleksandr
On 30.08.21 16:16, Jan Beulich wrote: Hi Jan On 29.08.2021 22:28, Oleksandr wrote: On 16.08.21 10:33, Jan Beulich wrote: On 14.08.2021 01:28, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h @@ -332,6 +332,11 @@ struct xen_arch_domainconfi

Re: [RFC PATCH] xen: Introduce arch specific field to XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo

2021-08-30 Thread Jan Beulich
On 29.08.2021 22:28, Oleksandr wrote: > On 16.08.21 10:33, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 14.08.2021 01:28, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: >>> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h >>> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h >>> @@ -332,6 +332,11 @@ struct xen_arch_domainconfig { >>>*/ >>> uint32_t

Re: [RFC PATCH] xen: Introduce arch specific field to XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo

2021-08-29 Thread Oleksandr
On 16.08.21 10:33, Jan Beulich wrote: Hi Jan Sorry for the late response. On 14.08.2021 01:28, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko We need to pass info about maximum supported address space size to the toolstack on Arm in order to properly calculate the base and size of

Re: [RFC PATCH] xen: Introduce arch specific field to XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo

2021-08-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 14.08.2021 01:28, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko > > We need to pass info about maximum supported address space size > to the toolstack on Arm in order to properly calculate the base > and size of the safe range for the guest. Use p2m_ipa_bits variable > which purpose

[RFC PATCH] xen: Introduce arch specific field to XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo

2021-08-13 Thread Oleksandr Tyshchenko
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko We need to pass info about maximum supported address space size to the toolstack on Arm in order to properly calculate the base and size of the safe range for the guest. Use p2m_ipa_bits variable which purpose is to hold the bit size of IPAs in P2M tables. As we change