On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.12.2022 03:01, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > What do you guys think? Nice automatic 20.7 scans for all patches and
> > for staging, but with the undesirable false-positive comments, or
> > no-20.7 scans but no comments in the tree?
>
> Anything
On 22.12.2022 03:01, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> What do you guys think? Nice automatic 20.7 scans for all patches and
> for staging, but with the undesirable false-positive comments, or
> no-20.7 scans but no comments in the tree?
Anything automatic which then also bugs submitters about issues
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 20/12/2022 08:50, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> > Cppcheck reports violations of rule 20.7 in two macros of
> > alternative.h.
> >
> > The first one is in the __ALT_PTR macro where cppcheck wants to have
> > parentheses on the second operand of
On 20.12.2022 10:07, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 20/12/2022 08:50, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> --- a/docs/misra/false-positive-cppcheck.json
>> +++ b/docs/misra/false-positive-cppcheck.json
>> @@ -3,6 +3,20 @@
>> "content": [
>> {
>> "id": "SAF-0-false-positive-cppcheck",
>>
Hi Luca,
On 20/12/2022 08:50, Luca Fancellu wrote:
Cppcheck reports violations of rule 20.7 in two macros of
alternative.h.
The first one is in the __ALT_PTR macro where cppcheck wants to have
parentheses on the second operand of a member access operator, which
is not allowed from the c
Cppcheck reports violations of rule 20.7 in two macros of
alternative.h.
The first one is in the __ALT_PTR macro where cppcheck wants to have
parentheses on the second operand of a member access operator, which
is not allowed from the c language syntax, furthermore, the macro
parameter is never
