As stated in rules.rst, functions used only in asm modules
are allowed to have no prior declaration visible when being
defined, hence these functions are marked with an
'asmlinkage' macro, which is then deviated for MISRA C:2012
Rule 8.4.
'current_stack_pointer' in x86/asm_defns is a declaration,
Hi Nicola,
On 30/10/2023 09:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
As stated in rules.rst, functions used only in asm modules
are allowed to have no prior declaration visible when being
defined, hence these functions are marked with an
'asmlinkage' macro, which is then deviated for MISRA C:2012
Rule 8.4.
A
On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ Therefore the absence of prior declarations is safe."
> -config=MC3R1.R8.4,reports+={safe, "first_area(any_loc(file(gc
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Nicola,
>
> On 30/10/2023 09:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > As stated in rules.rst, functions used only in asm modules
> > are allowed to have no prior declaration visible when being
> > defined, hence these functions are marked with an
> > 'asmlinkage'
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> As stated in rules.rst, functions used only in asm modules
> are allowed to have no prior declaration visible when being
> defined, hence these functions are marked with an
> 'asmlinkage' macro, which is then deviated for MISRA C:2012
> Rule 8.4.
>
> 'c
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> > +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> > @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ Therefore the absence of prior declarations is safe."
> > -config=MC3R
On 31.10.2023 00:02, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
>>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
>>> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ Therefore the absence
On 2023-10-30 23:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Nicola,
On 30/10/2023 09:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> As stated in rules.rst, functions used only in asm modules
> are allowed to have no prior declaration visible when being
> defined, hence these functio
On 2023-10-31 08:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.10.2023 00:02, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
+++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
@@ -163,6 +163
On 2023-10-30 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
+++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
@@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ Therefore the absence of prior declarations is
safe."
-config=MC3R1.R8.4,report
On 31.10.2023 09:22, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 2023-10-30 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
>>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
>>> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ Therefore the absence of
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.10.2023 09:22, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > On 2023-10-30 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> >>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> >>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
12 matches
Mail list logo