Hi Andrew,
On 16/03/2022 18:58, Andrew Cooper wrote:
diff --git a/xen/common/event_fifo.c b/xen/common/event_fifo.c
index ed4d3beb10f3..6c74ccebebb7 100644
--- a/xen/common/event_fifo.c
+++ b/xen/common/event_fifo.c
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void cf_check evtchn_fifo_set_pending(
On 16/03/2022 18:38, Raphael Ning wrote:
Currently, evtchn_fifo_set_pending() will mark the event as PENDING even
if it fails to lock the FIFO event queue(s), or if the guest has not
initialized the FIFO control block for the target vCPU. A well-behaved
guest should never trigger either of these
On 17/03/2022 14:26, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> I’ve tested on the ARM side, I’ve started/destroyed few guests from Dom0,
> connect to the console, run
> some network communications between guest and Dom0, everything works:
>
> Tested-by: Luca Fancellu
Thanks! I tested on x86 (in a QEMU VM) by
> On 16 Mar 2022, at 18:58, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 16/03/2022 18:38, Raphael Ning wrote:
>> From: Raphael Ning
>>
>> Currently, evtchn_fifo_set_pending() will mark the event as PENDING even
>> if it fails to lock the FIFO event queue(s), or if the guest has not
>> initialized the FIFO
On 16/03/2022 18:58, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/03/2022 18:38, Raphael Ning wrote:
>> From: Raphael Ning
>>
>> Currently, evtchn_fifo_set_pending() will mark the event as PENDING even
>> if it fails to lock the FIFO event queue(s), or if the guest has not
>> initialized the FIFO control block
On 17/03/2022 06:28, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 16.03.22 19:38, Raphael Ning wrote:
From: Raphael Ning
Currently, evtchn_fifo_set_pending() will mark the event as PENDING even
if it fails to lock the FIFO event queue(s), or if the guest has not
initialized the FIFO control block for the
On 16.03.22 19:38, Raphael Ning wrote:
From: Raphael Ning
Currently, evtchn_fifo_set_pending() will mark the event as PENDING even
if it fails to lock the FIFO event queue(s), or if the guest has not
initialized the FIFO control block for the target vCPU. A well-behaved
guest should never
On 16/03/2022 18:38, Raphael Ning wrote:
> From: Raphael Ning
>
> Currently, evtchn_fifo_set_pending() will mark the event as PENDING even
> if it fails to lock the FIFO event queue(s), or if the guest has not
> initialized the FIFO control block for the target vCPU. A well-behaved
> guest should
From: Raphael Ning
Currently, evtchn_fifo_set_pending() will mark the event as PENDING even
if it fails to lock the FIFO event queue(s), or if the guest has not
initialized the FIFO control block for the target vCPU. A well-behaved
guest should never trigger either of these cases.
There is no
