Give a name to unnamed parameters thus addressing violations of
MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.2 ("Function types shall be in prototype form with
named parameters").
Keep consistency between parameter names and types used in function
declarations and the ones used in the corresponding function
definitions, th
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023, Federico Serafini wrote:
> Give a name to unnamed parameters thus addressing violations of
> MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.2 ("Function types shall be in prototype form with
> named parameters").
> Keep consistency between parameter names and types used in function
> declarations and the
[XEN PATCH v2] device_tree: address violations of MISRA C:2012
> Rules 8.2 and 8.3
>
> Give a name to unnamed parameters thus addressing violations of
> MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.2 ("Function types shall be in prototype form with
> named parameters").
> Keep consist
Hi Federico,
On 24/07/2023 09:40, Federico Serafini wrote:
Give a name to unnamed parameters thus addressing violations of
MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.2 ("Function types shall be in prototype form with
named parameters").
Keep consistency between parameter names and types used in function
declarations a
Hello Julien,
On 25/07/23 12:02, Julien Grall wrote:
-unsigned int dt_number_of_address(const struct dt_device_node *dev)
+unsigned int dt_number_of_address(const struct dt_device_node *device)
We have a structure called 'device', so wouldn't this result to violate
another MISRA rule because id
