On 31.05.2024 10:05, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> 16.05.24 15:11, Jan Beulich:
>> On 15.05.2024 11:24, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>>> @@ -2667,7 +2667,9 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt
>>> *hvmemul_ctxt,
>>>
16.05.24 15:11, Jan Beulich:
On 15.05.2024 11:24, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
@@ -2667,7 +2667,9 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt
*hvmemul_ctxt,
break;
case VIO_mmio_completion:
+#ifdef CONFIG_V
On 15.05.2024 11:24, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> @@ -2667,7 +2667,9 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt
> *hvmemul_ctxt,
> break;
>
> case VIO_mmio_completion:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VMX
> case VIO_r
On Wed, 15 May 2024, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> From: Xenia Ragiadakou
>
> VIO_realmode_completion is specific to vmx realmode, so guard the completion
> handling code with CONFIG_VMX. Also, guard VIO_realmode_completion itself by
> CONFIG_VMX, instead of generic CONFIG_X86.
>
> No functional change
From: Xenia Ragiadakou
VIO_realmode_completion is specific to vmx realmode, so guard the completion
handling code with CONFIG_VMX. Also, guard VIO_realmode_completion itself by
CONFIG_VMX, instead of generic CONFIG_X86.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Xenia Ragiadakou
Signed-off-
