Re: [XEN v1 8/9] xen/arm: Other adaptations required to support 32bit paddr

2022-12-20 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 20/12/2022 15:24, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote: On 16/12/2022 10:23, Julien Grall wrote: Each adaptations are distinct, so I would prefer if they are in in separate patch. This will also make clear which components you touched because I would be surprised if this is really the only place w

Re: [XEN v1 8/9] xen/arm: Other adaptations required to support 32bit paddr

2022-12-20 Thread Ayan Kumar Halder
On 16/12/2022 10:23, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, Hi Julien, Each adaptations are distinct, so I would prefer if they are in in separate patch. This will also make clear which components you touched because I would be surprised if this is really the only place where we need adaptation. Maybe

Re: [XEN v1 8/9] xen/arm: Other adaptations required to support 32bit paddr

2022-12-16 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, Each adaptations are distinct, so I would prefer if they are in in separate patch. This will also make clear which components you touched because I would be surprised if this is really the only place where we need adaptation. Maybe that's because you didn't compile everything (which is f

[XEN v1 8/9] xen/arm: Other adaptations required to support 32bit paddr

2022-12-15 Thread Ayan Kumar Halder
1. Supersections are supported only for paddr greater than 32 bits. 2. Use 0 wherever physical addresses are right shifted for 32 bits. 3. Use PRIx64 to print u64 Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder --- xen/arch/arm/guest_walk.c | 2 ++ xen/arch/arm/mm.c | 2 +- xen/driver