Hi Andre/All,
Many thanks for your feedback.
On 11/01/2022 12:52, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:33:11 +
Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Hi Ayan,
Many thanks for your inputs. It is making better sense now. Much
appreciated.
A few questions/clarifications :-
On 06/01/2022
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:33:11 +
Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Hi Ayan,
> Many thanks for your inputs. It is making better sense now. Much
> appreciated.
>
> A few questions/clarifications :-
>
> On 06/01/2022 15:33, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:55:11 +
> > Ayan Kumar
Hi Andre,
Many thanks for your inputs. It is making better sense now. Much
appreciated.
A few questions/clarifications :-
On 06/01/2022 15:33, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:55:11 +
Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Hi,
Thank you so much for your feedback.
I need a couple of
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:55:11 +
Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Hi,
> Thank you so much for your feedback.
>
> I need a couple of clarifications before I can start with the v3 patch.
>
> On 08/12/2021 12:00, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 19:31:06 +
> > Julien Grall wrote:
> >
>
Hi,
Thank you so much for your feedback.
I need a couple of clarifications before I can start with the v3 patch.
On 08/12/2021 12:00, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 19:31:06 +
Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 01/12/2021 08:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Ayan,
On 30 Nov 2021,
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 19:31:06 +
Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
> On 01/12/2021 08:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> > Hi Ayan,
> >
> >> On 30 Nov 2021, at 19:13, Ayan Kumar Halder
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Andre,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your comments. They are useful.
> >>
> >> On 30/11/2021 09:49,
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 01/12/2021 08:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> > Hi Ayan,
> >
> > > On 30 Nov 2021, at 19:13, Ayan Kumar Halder
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andre,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your comments. They are useful.
> > >
> > > On 30/11/2021 09:49, Andre Przywara
Hi all,
On 01/12/2021 08:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Ayan,
On 30 Nov 2021, at 19:13, Ayan Kumar Halder
wrote:
Hi Andre,
Thanks for your comments. They are useful.
On 30/11/2021 09:49, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:16:38 +
Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Hi,
At the
On 01.12.2021 12:58, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:13:41 +
> Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
>> On 30/11/2021 09:49, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:16:38 +
>>> Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
At the moment, Xen is only handling data abort with valid syndrome
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:13:41 +
Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Hi Ayan,
> Thanks for your comments. They are useful.
>
> On 30/11/2021 09:49, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:16:38 +
> > Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> At the moment, Xen is only handling
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 08:41:13 +
Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi,
> > On 30 Nov 2021, at 19:13, Ayan Kumar Halder
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments. They are useful.
> >
> > On 30/11/2021 09:49, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:16:38 +
> >> Ayan
Hi Ayan,
> On 30 Nov 2021, at 19:13, Ayan Kumar Halder
> wrote:
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> Thanks for your comments. They are useful.
>
> On 30/11/2021 09:49, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:16:38 +
>> Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
>> Hi,
>>> At the moment, Xen is only handling data
On 30.11.2021 19:35, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> On 30/11/2021 07:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.11.2021 20:16, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
>>> +{
>>> +struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs();
>>> +unsigned int val;
>>> +
>>> +val = get_user_reg(regs, instr->code.rn);
>>> +
Hi Andre,
Thanks for your comments. They are useful.
On 30/11/2021 09:49, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:16:38 +
Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Hi,
At the moment, Xen is only handling data abort with valid syndrome (i.e.
ISV=0). Unfortunately, this doesn't cover all the
Hi Jan,
Thanks a lot for the feedback.
I need a clarification.
On 30/11/2021 07:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.11.2021 20:16, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
At the moment, Xen is only handling data abort with valid syndrome (i.e.
ISV=0). Unfortunately, this doesn't cover all the instructions a domain
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:16:38 +
Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Hi,
> At the moment, Xen is only handling data abort with valid syndrome (i.e.
> ISV=0). Unfortunately, this doesn't cover all the instructions a domain
> could use to access MMIO regions.
>
> For instance, Xilinx baremetal OS will
On 29.11.2021 20:16, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> At the moment, Xen is only handling data abort with valid syndrome (i.e.
> ISV=0). Unfortunately, this doesn't cover all the instructions a domain
> could use to access MMIO regions.
>
> For instance, Xilinx baremetal OS will use:
>
>
At the moment, Xen is only handling data abort with valid syndrome (i.e.
ISV=0). Unfortunately, this doesn't cover all the instructions a domain
could use to access MMIO regions.
For instance, Xilinx baremetal OS will use:
volatile u32 *LocalAddr = (volatile u32 *)Addr;
18 matches
Mail list logo
