Re: [XEN v5] xen/arm: Use the correct format specifier

2023-01-26 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Stefano, On 25/01/2023 21:09, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote: 1. One should use 'PRIpaddr' to display 'paddr_t' variables. However, while creating nodes in fdt, the address (if present in the node name) should be represented using 'PRIx64'. This is to

Re: [XEN v5] xen/arm: Use the correct format specifier

2023-01-25 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote: > 1. One should use 'PRIpaddr' to display 'paddr_t' variables. However, > while creating nodes in fdt, the address (if present in the node name) > should be represented using 'PRIx64'. This is to be in conformance > with the following rule present in

[XEN v5] xen/arm: Use the correct format specifier

2023-01-25 Thread Ayan Kumar Halder
1. One should use 'PRIpaddr' to display 'paddr_t' variables. However, while creating nodes in fdt, the address (if present in the node name) should be represented using 'PRIx64'. This is to be in conformance with the following rule present in https://elinux.org/Device_Tree_Linux . node names