On 6/28/19 11:46 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:58:53 +0200,
Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
Shifting the integer value 1 is evaluated using 32-bit
arithmetic and then used in an expression that expects a 64-bit
value, so there is potentially an integer overflow. Fix thi
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:58:53 +0200,
Colin King wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Shifting the integer value 1 is evaluated using 32-bit
> arithmetic and then used in an expression that expects a 64-bit
> value, so there is potentially an integer overflow. Fix this
> by using the BIT_ULL macro
From: Colin Ian King
Shifting the integer value 1 is evaluated using 32-bit
arithmetic and then used in an expression that expects a 64-bit
value, so there is potentially an integer overflow. Fix this
by using the BIT_ULL macro to perform the shift.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer ov
