On Wed, 2020-03-18 at 18:19 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> David Woodhouse writes ("Re: [PATCH] Add -MP to CFLAGS along with -MMD."):
> > OK... I have attempted to address my frustration in a more coherent and
> > hopefully productive way (qv), rather than resorting to monosyllabic
> > responses. Apol
David Woodhouse writes ("Re: [PATCH] Add -MP to CFLAGS along with -MMD."):
> OK... I have attempted to address my frustration in a more coherent and
> hopefully productive way (qv), rather than resorting to monosyllabic
> responses. Apologies for that.
>
> Back to the specifics of this patch...
W
On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 16:59 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> David Woodhouse writes ("Re: [PATCH] Add -MP to CFLAGS along with -MMD."):
> > On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 15:52 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 17.03.2020 15:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > > From: David Woodhouse
> > > >
> > > > This causes
On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 16:59 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> David Woodhouse writes ("Re: [PATCH] Add -MP to CFLAGS along with -MMD."):
> > On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 15:52 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 17.03.2020 15:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > > From: David Woodhouse
> > > >
> > > > This causes
David Woodhouse writes ("Re: [PATCH] Add -MP to CFLAGS along with -MMD."):
> On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 15:52 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 17.03.2020 15:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > From: David Woodhouse
> > >
> > > This causes gcc (yes, and clang) to emit phony targets for each
> > > depende
On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 15:52 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.03.2020 15:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > From: David Woodhouse
> >
> > This causes gcc (yes, and clang) to emit phony targets for each dependency.
> >
> > This means that when a header file is deleted, the C files which *used*
> > to
On 17.03.2020 15:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse
>
> This causes gcc (yes, and clang) to emit phony targets for each dependency.
>
> This means that when a header file is deleted, the C files which *used*
> to include it will no longer stop building with bogus out-of-date
> de
On 17/03/2020 14:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse
>
> This causes gcc (yes, and clang) to emit phony targets for each dependency.
>
> This means that when a header file is deleted, the C files which *used*
> to include it will no longer stop building with bogus out-of-date
> depe
From: David Woodhouse
This causes gcc (yes, and clang) to emit phony targets for each dependency.
This means that when a header file is deleted, the C files which *used*
to include it will no longer stop building with bogus out-of-date
dependencies like this:
make[5]: *** No rule to make targ
