>>> On 22.05.18 at 13:02, wrote:
> I still had to apply the patch below with 4.11rc4 for NetBSD.
> Any chance to get it in the 4.11 branch before release ?
See the thread "Pending patches for 4.11?" IOW - I very much hope so.
Jan
___
Xen-devel maili
Hello,
I still had to apply the patch below with 4.11rc4 for NetBSD.
Any chance to get it in the 4.11 branch before release ?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:41:20AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Commit df8234fd2c ("replace vCPU's dirty CPU mask by numeric ID") was
> too lax in two respects: First of all
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:41:20AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Commit df8234fd2c ("replace vCPU's dirty CPU mask by numeric ID") was
> too lax in two respects: First of all it didn't consider the case of a
> vCPU not having a valid dirty CPU in the descriptor table TLB flush
> case. This is the iss
>>> On 26.04.18 at 11:51, wrote:
> On 26/04/18 10:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
>> @@ -1202,11 +1202,23 @@ void put_page_from_l1e(l1_pgentry_t l1e,
>> unlikely(((page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_count_mask) != 0)) &&
>> (l1e_o
On 26/04/18 10:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> @@ -1202,11 +1202,23 @@ void put_page_from_l1e(l1_pgentry_t l1e,
> unlikely(((page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_count_mask) != 0)) &&
> (l1e_owner == pg_owner) )
> {
> +
Commit df8234fd2c ("replace vCPU's dirty CPU mask by numeric ID") was
too lax in two respects: First of all it didn't consider the case of a
vCPU not having a valid dirty CPU in the descriptor table TLB flush
case. This is the issue Manual has run into with NetBSD.
Additionally reads of ->dirty_cp
