On 27/02/2020 09:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> +BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(masks[0]) != FEATURESET_NR_ENTRIES);
>> Isn't this quite pointless with the now changed definition of
>> the array?
> I'd need to double check
Double check says it isn't necessary. I'll drop.
~Andrew
On 27/02/2020 07:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.02.2020 21:22, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Drop XC_FEATUREMASK_DEEP_FEATURES. It isn't used by any callers, and unlike
>> the other static masks, won't be of interest to anyone without other pieces
>> of
>> cpuid-autogen.h
>>
>> In
On 26.02.2020 21:22, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Drop XC_FEATUREMASK_DEEP_FEATURES. It isn't used by any callers, and unlike
> the other static masks, won't be of interest to anyone without other pieces of
> cpuid-autogen.h
>
> In xc_get_static_cpu_featuremask(), use a 2d array instead of
Drop XC_FEATUREMASK_DEEP_FEATURES. It isn't used by any callers, and unlike
the other static masks, won't be of interest to anyone without other pieces of
cpuid-autogen.h
In xc_get_static_cpu_featuremask(), use a 2d array instead of individually
named variables, and drop the switch statement
