Hi Andrew,
On 30/01/18 11:24, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 30/01/18 11:05, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 29/01/18 15:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On x86, we would like to alter how we patch based on whether there is
any
chance of the code being patched being concurrently executed.
On 30/01/18 11:05, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 29/01/18 15:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On x86, we would like to alter how we patch based on whether there is
>> any
>> chance of the code being patched being concurrently executed.
>>
>> prepare_payload() passes false (as the livepatch
Hi Andrew,
On 29/01/18 15:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On x86, we would like to alter how we patch based on whether there is any
chance of the code being patched being concurrently executed.
prepare_payload() passes false (as the livepatch definitely isn't live at this
point), whereas the
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On x86, we would like to alter how we patch based on whether there is any
> chance of the code being patched being concurrently executed.
>
> prepare_payload() passes false (as the livepatch definitely isn't live at this
> point), whereas the boot-time
