On 22/01/2018 09:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.01.18 at 18:48, wrote:
>> On 19/01/18 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> At most one bit can be set in the masks, so especially on larger systems
>>> it's quite a bit of unnecessary memory and processing overhead to track
On 19/01/18 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> At most one bit can be set in the masks, so especially on larger systems
> it's quite a bit of unnecessary memory and processing overhead to track
> the information as a mask. Store the numeric ID of the respective CPU
> instead, or NR_CPUS if no dirty state
On 01/19/2018 04:06 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> At most one bit can be set in the masks, so especially on larger systems
> it's quite a bit of unnecessary memory and processing overhead to track
> the information as a mask. Store the numeric ID of the respective CPU
> instead, or NR_CPUS if no dirty