On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:33:24AM +, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 11/15/19 11:21 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > The current code is a pretty good wtf moment, since we drop the
> > reference before we use it. It's not a big deal, because a) we only
> > use the pointer, so doesn't blow up
On 11/15/19 11:21 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The current code is a pretty good wtf moment, since we drop the
> reference before we use it. It's not a big deal, because a) we only
> use the pointer, so doesn't blow up and the real reason b) fb->obj[0]
> already holds a full reference for us.
>
>
The current code is a pretty good wtf moment, since we drop the
reference before we use it. It's not a big deal, because a) we only
use the pointer, so doesn't blow up and the real reason b) fb->obj[0]
already holds a full reference for us.
Might as well take the real pointer ins't of complicated
