While at it, remove declaration of vcpu_hvm_context and use the proper
header.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h | 3 ---
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h | 17 +
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/domain
>>> On 07.08.18 at 12:00, wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
Why? struct vcpu_hvm_context only needs a forward declaration, just
like was the case originally. Full structu
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 05:46:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.08.18 at 12:00, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > +#include
>
> Why? struct vcpu_hvm_context
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 05:24:15PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> > All uses sit either in HVM-specific code or inside is_hvm_...()
> > conditionals: Why do we need the inline stub? If the declaration
> > was visible independent of CONFIG_HVM, code would compile
> > fine, and references to the functio
>>> On 16.08.18 at 12:42, wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 05:24:15PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> >
>> > All uses sit either in HVM-specific code or inside is_hvm_...()
>> > conditionals: Why do we need the inline stub? If the declaration
>> > was visible independent of CONFIG_HVM, code would compil
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 05:24:15AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 16.08.18 at 12:42, wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 05:24:15PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > >
> >> > All uses sit either in HVM-specific code or inside is_hvm_...()
> >> > conditionals: Why do we need the inline stub? If the de
>>> On 16.08.18 at 14:59, wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 05:24:15AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 16.08.18 at 12:42, wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 05:24:15PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>> > >
>> >> > All uses sit either in HVM-specific code or inside is_hvm_...()
>> >> > conditionals:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 07:48:43AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 16.08.18 at 14:59, wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 05:24:15AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 16.08.18 at 12:42, wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 05:24:15PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> >> > >
> >> >> > All uses sit
