>>> On 30.01.18 at 18:33, wrote:
> On 30/01/18 17:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.01.18 at 13:32, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> @@ -1585,9 +1585,28 @@ static inline bool need_full_gdt(const struct domain
>>> *d)
>>> return is_pv_domain(d) && !
On 30/01/18 17:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.01.18 at 13:32, wrote:
>> When scheduling a vcpu subject to xpti activate the per-vcpu stacks
>> by loading the vcpu specific gdt and tss. When de-scheduling such a
>> vcpu switch back to the per physical cpu gdt and tss.
>>
>> Accessing the user re
>>> On 22.01.18 at 13:32, wrote:
> When scheduling a vcpu subject to xpti activate the per-vcpu stacks
> by loading the vcpu specific gdt and tss. When de-scheduling such a
> vcpu switch back to the per physical cpu gdt and tss.
>
> Accessing the user registers on the stack is done via helpers as
When scheduling a vcpu subject to xpti activate the per-vcpu stacks
by loading the vcpu specific gdt and tss. When de-scheduling such a
vcpu switch back to the per physical cpu gdt and tss.
Accessing the user registers on the stack is done via helpers as
depending on XPTI active or not the registe
