The end should be GICD_ISACTIVERN not GICD_ISACTIVER,
and also print a warning for the unhandled read.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan
---
V2:
Add a warning message
xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgi
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Peng Fan wrote:
> The end should be GICD_ISACTIVERN not GICD_ISACTIVER,
> and also print a warning for the unhandled read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan
> ---
>
> V2:
> Add a warning message
>
> xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c | 5 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion
+ Juergen
I missed that you weren't in CC to the original patch, sorry.
I think this patch should go in, as otherwise Linux 5.4 could run into
problems. It is also a pretty straightforward 4 lines patch.
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Peng Fan wrote:
> > T
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 20:43, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
+ Juergen
I missed that you weren't in CC to the original patch, sorry.
I think this patch should go in, as otherwise Linux 5.4 could run into
problems. It is also a pretty straightforward 4 lines patch.
5.5 (or 5.6) is not going to run on Xe
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/11/2019 20:43, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > + Juergen
> >
> > I missed that you weren't in CC to the original patch, sorry.
> > I think this patch should go in, as otherwise Linux 5.4 could run into
> > problems. It is also a pretty straig
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 23:17, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 20:43, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
+ Juergen
I missed that you weren't in CC to the original patch, sorry.
I think this patch should go in, as otherwise Linux 5.4 could run into
proble
On 27.11.19 01:01, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 23:17, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 20:43, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
+ Juergen
I missed that you weren't in CC to the original patch, sorry.
I think this patch should go in, as o
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix GICD_ISACTIVER
> range
>
> On 27.11.19 01:01, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 26/11/2019 23:17, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> >&g
On 27.11.19 10:31, Peng Fan wrote:
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix GICD_ISACTIVER
range
On 27.11.19 01:01, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 23:17, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 20:43, Stefano Stabellini
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix GICD_ISACTIVER
> range
>
> On 27.11.19 10:31, Peng Fan wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix
> >> GICD_ISACTIVER range
> >>
> >> On 27.11.19 01:01, Ju
On 27/11/2019 09:49, Peng Fan wrote:
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix GICD_ISACTIVER
range
On 27.11.19 10:31, Peng Fan wrote:
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix
GICD_ISACTIVER range
On 27.11.19 01:01, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/11
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 27.11.19 10:31, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix GICD_ISACTIVER
> > > range
> > >
> > > On 27.11.19 01:01, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > &
Hi Stefano,
On 28/11/2019 01:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 27.11.19 10:31, Peng Fan wrote:
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix GICD_ISACTIVER
range
On 27.11.19 01:01, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 23:17, Stefano
On 28.11.19 09:14, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On 28/11/2019 01:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 27.11.19 10:31, Peng Fan wrote:
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix
GICD_ISACTIVER
range
On 27.11.19 01:01, Julien Grall
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] arch: arm: vgic-v3: fix GICD_ISACTIVER
> range
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 28/11/2019 01:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> >> On 27.11.19 10:31, Peng Fan wrote:
> >>>> Sub
Hi,
On 28/11/2019 08:32, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 28.11.19 09:14, Julien Grall wrote:
In short, I think the patch should go in now and there are no downsides
to it. That's it, I rest my case. Julien, I hope you'll reconsider.
I don't really see the point to try to allow Linux 5.4 booting on Xen
4
On 28.11.19 09:48, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 28/11/2019 08:32, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 28.11.19 09:14, Julien Grall wrote:
In short, I think the patch should go in now and there are no downsides
to it. That's it, I rest my case. Julien, I hope you'll reconsider.
I don't really see the point to
On 28/11/2019 09:00, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 28.11.19 09:48, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 28/11/2019 08:32, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 28.11.19 09:14, Julien Grall wrote:
In short, I think the patch should go in now and there are no
downsides
to it. That's it, I rest my case. Julien, I hope you'll
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> > In both cases I see no reason to keep wrong code.
> >
> > Either the patch will let run Linux 5.4 fine - then the patch should
> > definitely be taken.
> That's up to Stefano and Peng to provide me information why this is fine.
> FAOD, the current justi
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, 18:09 Stefano Stabellini,
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > In both cases I see no reason to keep wrong code.
> > >
> > > Either the patch will let run Linux 5.4 fine - then the patch should
> > > definitely be taken.
> > That's up to Stefano and Peng to
20 matches
Mail list logo
