>>> On 11.02.19 at 13:03, wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:47:48AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 08.02.19 at 18:49, wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:21:28PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>> >> On 2/5/19 1:38 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:44:14AM -0700,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:47:48AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.02.19 at 18:49, wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:21:28PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 2/5/19 1:38 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:44:14AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> When the ass
>>> On 08.02.19 at 18:49, wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:21:28PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 2/5/19 1:38 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:44:14AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> When the assertion was introduced, MMIO wasn't handled by the
>> >> code correctly
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:21:28PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 2/5/19 1:38 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:44:14AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 05.02.19 at 11:40, wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:45:56AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.02.19
On 2/5/19 1:38 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:44:14AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.02.19 at 11:40, wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:45:56AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 04.02.19 at 18:18, wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Jan Beu
>>> On 05.02.19 at 14:38, wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:44:14AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.02.19 at 11:40, wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:45:56AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 04.02.19 at 18:18, wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Jan Beuli
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:44:14AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.02.19 at 11:40, wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:45:56AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 04.02.19 at 18:18, wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 30.01.19 at 11:
>>> On 05.02.19 at 11:40, wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:45:56AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 04.02.19 at 18:18, wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 30.01.19 at 11:36, wrote:
>> >> > The assert was originally added to make sure that h
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:45:56AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.02.19 at 18:18, wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 30.01.19 at 11:36, wrote:
> >> > The assert was originally added to make sure that higher order
> >> > regions (> PAGE_ORDER
>>> On 04.02.19 at 18:18, wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 30.01.19 at 11:36, wrote:
>> > The assert was originally added to make sure that higher order
>> > regions (> PAGE_ORDER_4K) could not be used to bypass the
>> > mmio_ro_ranges check performe
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.01.19 at 11:36, wrote:
> > The assert was originally added to make sure that higher order
> > regions (> PAGE_ORDER_4K) could not be used to bypass the
> > mmio_ro_ranges check performed by p2m_type_to_flags.
> >
> > This ho
>>> On 30.01.19 at 11:36, wrote:
> The assert was originally added to make sure that higher order
> regions (> PAGE_ORDER_4K) could not be used to bypass the
> mmio_ro_ranges check performed by p2m_type_to_flags.
>
> This however is already checked in set_mmio_p2m_entry, which makes
> sure that h
On 30/01/2019 10:36, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Subject s/ntp/npt/
~Andrew
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
The assert was originally added to make sure that higher order
regions (> PAGE_ORDER_4K) could not be used to bypass the
mmio_ro_ranges check performed by p2m_type_to_flags.
This however is already checked in set_mmio_p2m_entry, which makes
sure that higher order mappings don't overlap with mmio_r
14 matches
Mail list logo