If a pCPU has been/is being offlined, we don't want it to be neither
assigned to any pCPU, nor in the wait list.
So, avoid doing that while inserting or migrating vcpus.
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
---
Cc: George Dunlap
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Roger Pau Monne
---
xen/common/sched_null.c
On 8/25/18 1:21 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> If a pCPU has been/is being offlined, we don't want it to be neither
> assigned to any pCPU, nor in the wait list.
I take it the first `pCPU` should be `vCPU`?
Also, English grammar agreement is funny: `neither` needs to agree with
`nor`, but the two do
On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 17:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 8/25/18 1:21 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > If a pCPU has been/is being offlined, we don't want it to be
> > neither
> > assigned to any pCPU, nor in the wait list.
>
> I take it the first `pCPU` should be `vCPU`?
>
Indeed. :-)
> Also,
> On Jul 16, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 17:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 8/25/18 1:21 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>> If a pCPU has been/is being offlined, we don't want it to be
>>> neither
>>> assigned to any pCPU, nor in the wait list.
>>
>> I ta
On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 12:02 +, George Dunlap wrote:
> > On Jul 16, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Dario Faggioli
> > On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 17:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 8/25/18 1:21 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > >
> > > The other thing is, from a "developmental purity" point of view,
> > >
