>>> On 01.05.18 at 10:15, wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:25:26AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.04.18 at 13:46, wrote:
>>> +static int do_microcode_update(void *_info)
>>> +{
>>> +struct microcode_info *info = _info;
>>> +unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>> +int ret
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:25:26AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.04.18 at 13:46, wrote:
>> @@ -281,24 +288,56 @@ static int microcode_update_cpu(const void *buf,
>> size_t size)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> -static long do_microcode_update(void *_info)
>> +/* Wait for all CPUs to rend
>>> On 25.04.18 at 13:46, wrote:
> @@ -281,24 +288,56 @@ static int microcode_update_cpu(const void *buf, size_t
> size)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static long do_microcode_update(void *_info)
> +/* Wait for all CPUs to rendezvous with a timeout (us) */
> +static int wait_for_cpus(atomic_t *c
From: Gao Chao
This patch ports microcode improvement patches from linux kernel.
Before you read any further: the early loading method is still the
preferred one and you should always do that. The following patch is
improving the late loading mechanism for long running jobs and cloud use
cases.
