Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Protected Processor Inventory Number (PPIN) support

2019-12-16 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 16/12/2019 11:33, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 13.12.2019 20:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 08/11/2019 15:22, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> 1: include the PPIN in MCE records when available >>> 2: explicitly disallow guest access to PPIN >>> 3: provide Dom0 access to PPIN via XENPF_resource_op >>> >>> I hav

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Protected Processor Inventory Number (PPIN) support

2019-12-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 13.12.2019 20:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 08/11/2019 15:22, Jan Beulich wrote: >> 1: include the PPIN in MCE records when available >> 2: explicitly disallow guest access to PPIN >> 3: provide Dom0 access to PPIN via XENPF_resource_op >> >> I have yet to get around to post the Linux side consu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Protected Processor Inventory Number (PPIN) support

2019-12-13 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 08/11/2019 15:22, Jan Beulich wrote: > 1: include the PPIN in MCE records when available > 2: explicitly disallow guest access to PPIN > 3: provide Dom0 access to PPIN via XENPF_resource_op > > I have yet to get around to post the Linux side consumer > patch of the interface addition in patch 1.

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Protected Processor Inventory Number (PPIN) support

2019-11-08 Thread Jan Beulich
1: include the PPIN in MCE records when available 2: explicitly disallow guest access to PPIN 3: provide Dom0 access to PPIN via XENPF_resource_op I have yet to get around to post the Linux side consumer patch of the interface addition in patch 1. Jan