On 05/04/18 00:17, Amit Tomer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Ah yes, if that works, we should. That bit is from the Linux BSP, isn't it?
>
> Yes, it's from Linux BSP code only. Hope following is fine.
>
> if ( reg & STATUS_TXFIFO_EMP )
> return TX_FIFO_SIZE;
> else if ( reg &
Hi,
> Ah yes, if that works, we should. That bit is from the Linux BSP, isn't it?
Yes, it's from Linux BSP code only. Hope following is fine.
if ( reg & STATUS_TXFIFO_EMP )
return TX_FIFO_SIZE;
else if ( reg & STAT_TX_FIFO_HFL )
return TX_FIFO_SIZE / 2;
else if (
On 04/04/18 23:25, Amit Tomer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Just a nit, but it might be smarter to first check for the receive IRQ,
>> because not handling this might loose information. TX is less critical.
>
> Ok, actually tried it ealier when I was debugging the Rx path issue and
> that time it didn't
Hi,
> Just a nit, but it might be smarter to first check for the receive IRQ,
> because not handling this might loose information. TX is less critical.
Ok, actually tried it ealier when I was debugging the Rx path issue and
that time it didn't work. May be I should try it again.
> Similar to
Hi,
On 03/04/18 14:49, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
> This patch adds driver for UART controller found on Armada 3700 SoC.
>
> There is no reference manuals available for 3700 SoC in public and it
> is derived by looking at Linux driver[1].
>
>
This patch adds driver for UART controller found on Armada 3700 SoC.
There is no reference manuals available for 3700 SoC in public and it
is derived by looking at Linux driver[1].
[1]https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/tty/serial/mvebu-uart.c
Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar
