>>> On 02.03.18 at 20:34, wrote:
> On 02/03/18 07:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.03.18 at 17:58, wrote:
>>> The pont of having the toolchain put out optimised nops is to avoid the
>>> need for us to patch the site at all. I.e. calling optimise_nops() on a
>>> set of toolchain nops defeats th
On 02/03/18 07:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.03.18 at 17:58, wrote:
>> On 01/03/18 10:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 01.03.18 at 11:36, wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:28:27AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
Andrew Cooper 02/28/18 7:20 PM >>>
>> On 28/02/18 16:22, Jan Beulich
>>> On 01.03.18 at 17:58, wrote:
> On 01/03/18 10:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.03.18 at 11:36, wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:28:27AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Andrew Cooper 02/28/18 7:20 PM >>>
> On 28/02/18 16:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.02.18 at 12:35, wro
On 01/03/18 10:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.03.18 at 11:36, wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:28:27AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Andrew Cooper 02/28/18 7:20 PM >>>
On 28/02/18 16:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.02.18 at 12:35, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/alte
>>> On 01.03.18 at 11:36, wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:28:27AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> Andrew Cooper 02/28/18 7:20 PM >>>
>> >On 28/02/18 16:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > On 26.02.18 at 12:35, wrote:
>> >>> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/alternative-asm.h
>> >>> +++ b/xen/include/as
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:28:27AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Andrew Cooper 02/28/18 7:20 PM >>>
> >On 28/02/18 16:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 26.02.18 at 12:35, wrote:
> >>> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/alternative-asm.h
> >>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/alternative-asm.h
> >>> @@ -1,6 +1,
>>> Andrew Cooper 02/28/18 7:20 PM >>>
>On 28/02/18 16:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.02.18 at 12:35, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/alternative-asm.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/alternative-asm.h
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>>> #ifndef _ASM_X86_ALTERNATIVE_ASM_H_
>>> #define _ASM_X86_ALTER
On 28/02/18 16:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.02.18 at 12:35, wrote:
>> Newer versions of binutils are capable of emitting an exact number bytes
>> worth
>> of optimised nops. Use this in preference to .skip when available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> In principle
> Reviewed-by: Jan
>>> On 26.02.18 at 12:35, wrote:
> Newer versions of binutils are capable of emitting an exact number bytes worth
> of optimised nops. Use this in preference to .skip when available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
In principle
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
However, ...
> RFC until support is ac
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 01:08:05PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 26/02/18 12:31, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:35:04AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> Newer versions of binutils are capable of emitting an exact number bytes
> >> worth
> >> of optimised nops. Use this i
On 26/02/18 12:31, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:35:04AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Newer versions of binutils are capable of emitting an exact number bytes
>> worth
>> of optimised nops. Use this in preference to .skip when available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:35:04AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Newer versions of binutils are capable of emitting an exact number bytes worth
> of optimised nops. Use this in preference to .skip when available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich
> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wi
Newer versions of binutils are capable of emitting an exact number bytes worth
of optimised nops. Use this in preference to .skip when available.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
CC: Roger Pau Monné
CC: Wei Liu
RFC until support is actually committe
13 matches
Mail list logo
