On 02.03.2020 10:37, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 02.03.20 10:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.02.2020 06:47, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 28.02.20 20:06, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 28/02/2020 17:13, Juergen Gross wrote:
> @@ -700,6 +688,32 @@ int
>
On 02.03.20 10:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.02.2020 06:47, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 28.02.20 20:06, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 28/02/2020 17:13, Juergen Gross wrote:
@@ -700,6 +688,32 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void)
buf, unsigned long len)
return ret;
}
On 29.02.2020 06:47, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 28.02.20 20:06, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 28/02/2020 17:13, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> @@ -700,6 +688,32 @@ int
>>> microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long len)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +int
On 28.02.20 20:06, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 28/02/2020 17:13, Juergen Gross wrote:
@@ -700,6 +688,32 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void)
buf, unsigned long len)
return ret;
}
+int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long len)
+{
+
On 28/02/2020 17:13, Juergen Gross wrote:
> @@ -700,6 +688,32 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void)
> buf, unsigned long len)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long
> len)
> +{
> +int ret;
> +struct
With core scheduling active it is mandatory for stop_machine_run() to
be called in idle context only (so either during boot or in a tasklet),
as otherwise a scheduling deadlock would occur: stop_machine_run()
does a cpu rendezvous by activating a tasklet on all other cpus. In
case
