On 21/02/18 16:37, Julien Grall wrote:
On 21/02/18 16:27, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On 15/02/18 15:02, Julien Grall wrote:
Currently, the behavior of do_common_cpu will slightly change depending
on the PSCI version passed in parameter. Looking at the code, more the
specific 0.2
On 21/02/18 16:27, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On 15/02/18 15:02, Julien Grall wrote:
Currently, the behavior of do_common_cpu will slightly change depending
on the PSCI version passed in parameter. Looking at the code, more the
specific 0.2 behavior could move out of the function or
Hi,
On 15/02/18 15:02, Julien Grall wrote:
> Currently, the behavior of do_common_cpu will slightly change depending
> on the PSCI version passed in parameter. Looking at the code, more the
> specific 0.2 behavior could move out of the function or adapted for 0.1:
>
> - x0/r0 can be updated
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
> Currently, the behavior of do_common_cpu will slightly change depending
> on the PSCI version passed in parameter. Looking at the code, more the
> specific 0.2 behavior could move out of the function or adapted for 0.1:
>
> - x0/r0 can be updated on
Currently, the behavior of do_common_cpu will slightly change depending
on the PSCI version passed in parameter. Looking at the code, more the
specific 0.2 behavior could move out of the function or adapted for 0.1:
- x0/r0 can be updated on PSCI 0.1 because general purpose registers
are