Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through hvm_funcs to direct ones

2018-10-04 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 03.10.18 at 20:55, wrote: > On 02/10/18 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote: >> This is intentionally not touching hooks used rarely (or not at all) >> during the lifetime of a VM, like {domain,vcpu}_initialise or cpu_up, >> as well as nested, VM event, and altp2m ones (they can all be done >> later,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through hvm_funcs to direct ones

2018-10-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 02/10/18 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote: > This is intentionally not touching hooks used rarely (or not at all) > during the lifetime of a VM, like {domain,vcpu}_initialise or cpu_up, > as well as nested, VM event, and altp2m ones (they can all be done > later, if so desired). Virtual Interrupt delive

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through hvm_funcs to direct ones

2018-10-02 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 02 October 2018 11:13 > To: xen-devel > Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Paul Durrant > ; Wei Liu > Subject: [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through hvm_funcs > to direct ones > > This is intentionally not touc

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through hvm_funcs to direct ones

2018-10-02 Thread Jan Beulich
This is intentionally not touching hooks used rarely (or not at all) during the lifetime of a VM, like {domain,vcpu}_initialise or cpu_up, as well as nested, VM event, and altp2m ones (they can all be done later, if so desired). Virtual Interrupt delivery ones will be dealt with in a subsequent pat