On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:00:34AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:58:06AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:34:11PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> >> static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc)
> >> @@ -236,31 +259,13 @@ static int
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:58:06AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:34:11PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> to a more generic function. The benefit is that this function can be
>> used to check whether a microcode is newer than another as well. We
>> rely on this function to
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:34:11PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> to a more generic function. The benefit is that this function can be
> used to check whether a microcode is newer than another as well. We
> rely on this function to decide to perform a replacement or an add when
> updating the global
to a more generic function. The benefit is that this function can be
used to check whether a microcode is newer than another as well. We
rely on this function to decide to perform a replacement or an add when
updating the global microcode cache (introduced by later patches in
this series).
