Using scratch_cpumask in send_IPI_mask is not safe in IRQ or exception
context because it can nest, and hence send_IPI_mask could be
overwriting another user scratch cpumask data when used in such
contexts.
Instead introduce a new cpumask to be used by send_IPI_mask, and
disable interrupts while u
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:19:21PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Using scratch_cpumask in send_IPI_mask is not safe in IRQ or exception
> context because it can nest, and hence send_IPI_mask could be
> overwriting another user scratch cpumask data when used in such
> contexts.
>
> Instead introd
