>>> On 30.11.18 at 09:57, wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:46:05AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:28:46PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>>> It is better that all CPUs have the same microcode revision.
>>>
>>> Linux kernel rejects late microcode update if finding some
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:46:05AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:28:46PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> >On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:34:14PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:28:46PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:34:14PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
> >> index 8350d22..cca7b2c 100644
> >>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:34:14PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> cpu_request_microcode() will only parse microcode file and save
>> suitable microcodes to microcode_cache. To update microcode,
>> apply_microcode() should be invoked
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:34:14PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> cpu_request_microcode() will only parse microcode file and save
> suitable microcodes to microcode_cache. To update microcode,
> apply_microcode() should be invoked explicitly.
>
> On AMD side, svm_host_osvw_init() is supposed to be
cpu_request_microcode() will only parse microcode file and save
suitable microcodes to microcode_cache. To update microcode,
apply_microcode() should be invoked explicitly.
On AMD side, svm_host_osvw_init() is supposed to be called after
microcode update. As apply_micrcode() won't be called by
