> -Original Message-
> >>> +HVM guests can already be migrated on Xen without guest co-operation but
> >>> only
> >>> +if they don’t have PV drivers installed[1] or are in power state S3. The
> >>
> >> S3 is very ACPI centric, so I would prefer if we avoid the term. I think
> >> the non-AC
; Ian Jackson ; Jan
> Beulich
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] docs/designs: Add a design document
> for non-cooperative live
> migration
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> The proposal looks sensible to me. Some NITpicking below.
>
> On 13/02/2020 10:53, Paul Durrant wrote:
>
Jackson ; Jan Beulich
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] docs/designs: Add a design document for
non-cooperative live
migration
Hi Paul,
The proposal looks sensible to me. Some NITpicking below.
On 13/02/2020 10:53, Paul Durrant wrote:
It has become apparent to some large cloud
Hi Paul,
The proposal looks sensible to me. Some NITpicking below.
On 13/02/2020 10:53, Paul Durrant wrote:
It has become apparent to some large cloud providers that the current
model of cooperative migration of guests under Xen is not usable as it
relies on software running inside the guest, w
It has become apparent to some large cloud providers that the current
model of cooperative migration of guests under Xen is not usable as it
relies on software running inside the guest, which is likely beyond the
provider's control.
This patch introduces a proposal for non-cooperative live migratio
