On 17.01.2020 20:12, Lars Kurth wrote:
> People allowed to vote on behalf of the Hypervisor project are:
> Julien Grall, Andy Cooper, George Dunlap, Ian Jackson, Jan Beulich, Konrad R
> Wilk, Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu and Paul Durrant (as Release Manager).
I have to admit that with certain
Lars Kurth writes ("[Vote] For Xen Project Code of Conduct (deadline March
31st)"):
> People allowed to vote on behalf of the Hypervisor project are:
> Julien Grall, Andy Cooper, George Dunlap, Ian Jackson, Jan Beulich, Konrad R
> Wilk, Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu and Paul Durrant (as Release
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:12:11PM +, Lars Kurth wrote:
> I propose to tally the votes after March 31st. You can reply via
> +1: for proposal
> -1: against proposal
> in public or private.
+1
___
Xen-devel mailing list
On 1/17/20 7:12 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for some time now we have been discussing the Xen Project Code of
> Conduct. The most recent set of feedback has been primarily around
> minor language issues (US vs UL English, etc.), which indicates to me
> that the proposal is ready to be
> -Original Message-
>
> People allowed to vote on behalf of the Hypervisor project are:
> Julien Grall, Andy Cooper, George Dunlap, Ian Jackson, Jan Beulich, Konrad
> R
> Wilk, Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu and Paul Durrant (as Release Manager).
+1
>
> People allowed to vote on behalf
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for some time now we have been discussing the Xen Project Code of
> Conduct. The most recent set of feedback has been primarily around
> minor language issues (US vs UL English, etc.), which indicates to me
> that the proposal is ready to be
Apologies,
some of the links I added for convenience do not work
> It should be read in the following order
The correct links are
*
http://xenbits.xenproject.org/gitweb/?p=people/larsk/code-of-conduct.git;a=blob;f=code-of-conduct.md;hb=refs/heads/CoC-v5
*
Hi all,
for some time now we have been discussing the Xen Project Code of
Conduct. The most recent set of feedback has been primarily around
minor language issues (US vs UL English, etc.), which indicates to me
that the proposal is ready to be voted on
The final version which addresses all the
