[Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 124100: regressions - FAIL

2018-06-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 124100 xen-4.8-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/124100/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-xsm broken in 124070 build-i386-pvops

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 124100: regressions - FAIL

2018-06-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Jan asked me to investigate why we weren't getting a push on Xen 4.8. I investigated the failures in this osstest report. I think we have a combination of: * Flaky armhf hardware * A real Xen-related heisenbug bug (but which is not a regression) (the EFAULT libxc/linux bug; CC to Juergen)

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 124100: regressions - FAIL

2018-06-13 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 13.06.18 at 13:18, wrote: > Jan asked me to investigate why we weren't getting a push on Xen 4.8. > I investigated the failures in this osstest report. > > I think we have a combination of: > > * Flaky armhf hardware > > * A real Xen-related heisenbug bug (but which is not a regression

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 124100: regressions - FAIL

2018-06-14 Thread Ian Jackson
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-4.8-testing test] 124100: regressions - FAIL"): > I'd favor a sufficiently justified (as it is now) force push, and then > an immediate release. As you say elsewhere, the problem with in > particular the albanas has been bad enough for it to be sufficiently > unpredict

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 124100: regressions - FAIL

2018-07-16 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 06/13/2018 05:18 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: Jim: please read down to where I discuss test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair. If you have any insight I'd appreciate it. Let me know if you want me to preserve the logs, which will otherwise expire in a few weeks. Whoa, sorry for the delay. This mail found