flight 118229 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118229/
Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 118219 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a build-amd64-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a test-armhf-armhf-xl 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass version targeted for testing: xen 66bf4ef04869548128b70d8d371ec992189a6a1c baseline version: xen 56498d2cf9d3c5f7d3d894a89f7d66ed81548e01 Last test of basis 118219 2018-01-19 01:01:22 Z 0 days Testing same since 118226 2018-01-19 11:02:00 Z 0 days 2 attempts ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org> Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org> jobs: build-arm64-xsm pass build-amd64 fail build-armhf pass build-amd64-libvirt blocked test-armhf-armhf-xl pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 blocked test-amd64-amd64-libvirt blocked ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org logs: /home/logs/logs images: /home/logs/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Not pushing. ------------------------------------------------------------ commit 66bf4ef04869548128b70d8d371ec992189a6a1c Author: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> Date: Fri Jan 19 11:17:30 2018 +0100 x86/hvm: re-work viridian APIC assist code It appears there is a case where Windows enables the APIC assist enlightenment[1] but does not use it. This scenario is perfectly valid according to the documentation, but causes the state machine in Xen to become confused leading to a domain_crash() such as the following: (XEN) d4: VIRIDIAN GUEST_OS_ID: vendor: 1 os: 4 major: 6 minor: 1 sp: 0 build: 1db0 (XEN) d4: VIRIDIAN HYPERCALL: enabled: 1 pfn: 3ffff (XEN) d4v0: VIRIDIAN VP_ASSIST_PAGE: enabled: 1 pfn: 3fffe (XEN) domain_crash called from viridian.c:452 (XEN) Domain 4 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#1: The following sequence of events is an example of how this can happen: - On return to guest vlapic_has_pending_irq() finds a bit set in the IRR. - vlapic_ack_pending_irq() calls viridian_start_apic_assist() which latches the vector, sets the bit in the ISR and clears it from the IRR. - The guest then processes the interrupt but EOIs it normally, therefore clearing the bit in the ISR. - On next return to guest vlapic_has_pending_irq() calls viridian_complete_apic_assist(), which discovers the assist bit still set in the shared page and therefore leaves the latched vector in place, but also finds another bit set in the IRR. - vlapic_ack_pending_irq() is then called but, because the ISR is was cleared by the EOI, another call is made to viridian_start_apic_assist() and this then calls domain_crash() because it finds the latched vector has not been cleared. Having re-visited the code I also conclude that Xen's implementation of the enlightenment is currently wrong and we are not properly following the specification. The specification says: "The hypervisor sets the ÂNo EOI required bit when it injects a virtual interrupt if the following conditions are satisfied: - The virtual interrupt is edge-triggered, and - There are no lower priority interrupts pending. If, at a later time, a lower priority interrupt is requested, the hypervisor clears the ÂNo EOI required such that a subsequent EOI causes an intercept. In case of nested interrupts, the EOI intercept is avoided only for the highest priority interrupt. This is necessary since no count is maintained for the number of EOIs performed by the OS. Therefore only the first EOI can be avoided and since the first EOI clears the ÂNo EOI Required bit, the next EOI generates an intercept." Thus it is quite legitimate to set the "No EOI required" bit and then subsequently take a higher priority interrupt without clearing the bit. Thus the avoided EOI will then relate to that subsequent interrupt rather than the highest priority interrupt when the bit was set. Hence latching the vector when setting the bit is not entirely useful and somewhat misleading. This patch re-works the APIC assist code to simply track when the "No EOI required" bit is set and test if it has been cleared by the guest (i.e. 'completing' the APIC assist), thus indicating a 'missed EOI'. Missed EOIs need to be dealt with in two places: - In vlapic_has_pending_irq(), to avoid comparing the IRR against a stale ISR, and - In vlapic_EOI_set() because a missed EOI for a higher priority vector should be dealt with before the actual EOI for the lower priority vector. Furthermore, because the guest is at liberty to ignore the "No EOI required" bit (which lead the crash detailed above) vlapic_EOI_set() must also make sure the bit is cleared to avoid confusing the state machine. Lastly the previous code did not properly emulate an EOI if a missed EOI was discovered in vlapic_has_pending_irq(); it merely cleared the bit in the ISR. The new code instead calls vlapic_EOI_set(). [1] See section 10.3.5 of Microsoft's "Hypervisor Top Level Functional Specification v5.0b". NOTE: The changes to the save/restore code are safe because the layout of struct hvm_viridian_vcpu_context is unchanged and the new interpretation of the (previously so named) vp_assist_vector field as the boolean pending flag maintains the correct semantics. Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> commit 48a933ee590e2fdfa240484ebda4f76096277d7e Author: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> Date: Fri Jan 19 11:16:58 2018 +0100 x86/efi: fix build with linkers that support both coff-x86-64 and pe-x86-64 When using a linker that supports both formats the following error will be triggered: efi/buildid.o: file not recognized: File format is ambiguous efi/buildid.o: matching formats: coff-x86-64 pe-x86-64 Solve this by specifying the efi/buildid.o format to pe-x86-64. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Doug Goldstein <car...@cardoe.com> commit 97207ddd3b2bbbf6e723d8c5f2a93592a1cf5d81 Author: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Date: Fri Jan 19 11:16:10 2018 +0100 x86/shadow: widen reference count Utilize as many of the bits available in the union as possible, without (just to be on the safe side) colliding with any of the bits outside of PGT_type_mask. Note that the first and last hunks of the xen/include/asm-x86/mm.h change are merely code motion. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Acked-by: Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> commit 7867181b2ad63f0d2f1ba97598e577538b83882f Author: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Date: Fri Jan 19 11:14:42 2018 +0100 x86/PoD: correctly handle non-order-0 decrease-reservation requests p2m_pod_decrease_reservation() at the moment only returns a boolean value: true for "nothing more to do", false for "something more to do". If it returns false, decrease_reservation() will loop over the entire range, calling guest_remove_page() for each page. Unfortunately, in the case p2m_pod_decrease_reservation() succeeds partially, some of the memory in the range will be not-present; at which point guest_remove_page() will return an error, and the entire operation will fail. Fix this by: 1. Having p2m_pod_decrease_reservation() return exactly the number of gpfn pages it has handled (i.e., replaced with 'not present'). 2. Making guest_remove_page() return -ENOENT in the case that the gpfn in question was already empty (and in no other cases). 3. When looping over guest_remove_page(), expect the number of -ENOENT failures to be no larger than the number of pages p2m_pod_decrease_reservation() removed. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org> commit 75c47ae9b63483ac404ea7e4a28cb5fb1d989ef8 Author: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Date: Fri Jan 19 11:09:55 2018 +0100 x86/HVM: make explicit that hvm_print_line() does output only On input "c" being 0xff should already have the effect of bailing early (due to the isprint()), but let's rather make this explicit. Also convert the BUG_ON() to an ASSERT() (nothing fatal happens in the function if this is violated), at the same time extending what is being checked. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> (qemu changes not included)
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel