On 17/07/2019 13:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.07.2019 12:33, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Jul 16, 2019, at 11:03 PM, Andrew Cooper
>>>
>>> We could trivially throw the fixes into the branch, tag it, sign it and
>>> throw it out into the open, but doing that on the embargo date itself
>>> would res
On 17.07.2019 12:33, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>> On Jul 16, 2019, at 11:03 PM, Andrew Cooper
>>
>> We could trivially throw the fixes into the branch, tag it, sign it and
>> throw it out into the open, but doing that on the embargo date itself
>> would result in an official release of Xen which has
> On Jul 16, 2019, at 11:03 PM, Andrew Cooper
>
> We could trivially throw the fixes into the branch, tag it, sign it and
> throw it out into the open, but doing that on the embargo date itself
> would result in an official release of Xen which has had 0 testing in
> the incumbent test system.
Hi,
On 7/15/19 4:42 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 7/15/19 3:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.07.2019 16:11, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> There was a long discussion about security patches, with the general
>>> proposal being that we should cut a point release for every security issue.
>>
>> Interest
On 15/07/2019 18:52, Amit Shah wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 14:52 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.07.2019 16:42, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 7/15/19 3:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.07.2019 16:11, George Dunlap wrote:
> There was a long discussion about security patches, with the
>>>
On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 14:52 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.07.2019 16:42, George Dunlap wrote:
> > On 7/15/19 3:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 15.07.2019 16:11, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > > There was a long discussion about security patches, with the
> > > > general
> > > > proposal being th
On 15.07.2019 16:42, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 7/15/19 3:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.07.2019 16:11, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> There was a long discussion about security patches, with the general
>>> proposal being that we should cut a point release for every security issue.
>>
>> Interesting.
On 7/15/19 3:42 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 7/15/19 3:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.07.2019 16:11, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> There was a long discussion about security patches, with the general
>>> proposal being that we should cut a point release for every security issue.
>>
>> Interesting.
On 7/15/19 3:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.07.2019 16:11, George Dunlap wrote:
>> There was a long discussion about security patches, with the general
>> proposal being that we should cut a point release for every security issue.
>
> Interesting. Looks like in politics that until a decision fi
On 15.07.2019 16:11, George Dunlap wrote:
> There was a long discussion about security patches, with the general
> proposal being that we should cut a point release for every security issue.
Interesting. Looks like in politics that until a decision fits people
they keep re-raising the point. Iirc
Much of this covered things discussed elsewhere:
* Allowing multiple versions of the tools to be installed at the same time
* Getting rid of external builds
There was a long discussion about security patches, with the general
proposal being that we should cut a point release for every security iss
11 matches
Mail list logo